On Friday, February 13, audiences will flock to theaters nationwide to catch up with an old, dear friend — who just happens to wear a hockey mask and slaughter teenagers by the dozen. That's right, Jason is back with a brand-new, slickly produced, Michael Bay-powered reinvention of "Friday the 13th" that drags the Crystal Lake killer into the 21st century. But how does it stack up to the original and its earlier sequels?
To answer that question, your humble MTV Movies correspondent (me) re-watched all 11 Jason movies — and saw the new 12th one — in six days. And what I found speaks volumes about the various filmmakers who've handled (or mishandled) the franchise, the bloodlust of the movies' fanbase and why Jason is still the best when it comes to the "ritual" in ritual killing.
(The results of our scientific sex & violence survey can be seen in graph form.)
Let's start with what supposedly matters most to us "Friday the 13th" fans: the body count. In the new "Friday the 13th," Jason kills 12 people, tying 1984's "Friday the 13th Part IV: The Final Chapter" for the third-fewest murders. Generally, the franchise's bloodlust grew with each sequel, maxing out at an amazing 23 in 2001's "Jason X," before 2003's "Freddy vs. Jason" had the goalie-masked murderer sharing victims — yet still notching 17 kills.